
![]() |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [heathkit] ARRL MUST GET BETTER
Good comments Garey and points well taken. My balls are staying firmly in place, thank you! I might even renew with ARRL yet. I had a very good exchange today with Jim Haynie on this matter. 73 - Bry, AF4K On 6 Mar 2005 at 10:42, Garey Barrell wrote: > Let "George" do it..... > > It's interesting that "your" explanation is two years old. Ya think > it's possible that something might have changed since then? > Naaaahhh. > > I just spoke to MY Director a few weeks ago, he was quite > knowledgeable on the subject, and said that the subject was to be > worked out at the director's meeting in July. He was of the opinion > that while there needed to be accommodation for this mode, it didn't > require large chunks of spectrum and should be restricted to a narrow > (5-10 kHz) "band" except in cases of DECLARED communications > emergencies.. We shall see..... > > Can you please all the people all the time?? Not a chance. > > Can you do what is determined by a group of representatives to be best > for the greatest number? Most of the time. > > Can YOU have any input into the determination? Not if you take your > ball and go home. > > 73, Garey - K4OAH > Atlanta > > Drake C-Line Service Manual > <http://hr99.home.mindspring.com/R-4C_Servicez/> > > > > Brian Carling wrote: > > >Guys - I have just received two solicitations in the U.S. mail > >from ARRL to renew my membership. > > > >I could easily afford it... > >In fact I have been an ARRL member since 1975... > >Here is why I will NOT be renewing after THIRTY YEARS: > > > >In my opinion the ARRL leadership team has been selling > >us down the river and refusing to listen to good reason. > >MANY radio amateurs have contacted our officers and > >representatives on this issue only to be met with a stone > >wall. > > > >I am so very sorry to have to give up on the organization that > >I have loved and believed in for over 30 years. > > > >They had their chance, but they ignored sound advice. > >They refused to even discuss it in most cases. > > > >Here is my explanation: > >http://www.af4k.com/Ham/dissent.htm > > > > > > > > >
Tech Resources | Related Sites | Special Features | Listserv
Home | History | Hi-Fi & Stereo | Ham Radio | Test Equipment | Computers | Other
Copyright © 2008 Cyberventures Unlimited. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use
The Heathkit equipment shown on this website is no longer manufactured and is shown here for historical purposes. |